黑色皮革手册

SC delivers split verdict in Hijab case_我的网站

A |     暴風主場對陣天空的WNBA常規賽較量，將在週一清晨展開爭奪，這是雙方今季常規賽第3次正面對話。    New Delhi, Oct 13 (UNI) A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a split verdict in the Hijab ban case, and referred the matter to the Chief Justice's (CJI) court for his direction to constitute a larger bench to decide the issue.

The bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia delivered the verdict on a batch of appeals against the Karnataka High Court judgment upholding the hijab ban in educational institutions.

"We have divergent of opinion, I have framed 11 questions on the issue," Justice Hemant Gupta who led the bench said in hiss verdict.

While dismissing the batch of appeals filed by many students, Justice Gupta affirmed the high court's order on the hijab ban and said, "the matter be sent to the CJI for constituting a larger bench to hear the case."

The two-judge bench on September 26, had reserved its order, after hearing from all the parties -- 23 petitioners, their lawyers, and the Karnataka government for a marathon 10 days.

The apex court pronounced the verdict on 23 petitions, including that of, Aishat Shifa, and others.

The state government has argued in the Supreme Court that it had the authority to issue an order to educational institutions to follow the discipline of wearing the prescribed school uniforms.

Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the students/ petitioners, argued that fundamental rights, freedom to choose to what to wear and freedom of faith would not diminish inside a classroom.

The lawyers for the students -- Devadatt Kamat, Dr Rajeev Dhavan amd Dishyant Dave -- submitted in the top court that the Karnataka State government had not presented even a single shred of evidence to support their claim that a few students wearing hijab to their classrooms in addition to their respective uniforms violated public order, health and morality.

The lawyers further said that the Karnataka government had not provide any material to support their claim that wearing hijab infringed on the fundamental rights of other students.

A Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit and Justice J M Khazi, in their judgement on March 15, this year, held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam.

The high courts's three-judge bench, had dismissed the petitions filed by a group of Muslim girl students against PU government college for denying them entry while wearing Hijab.

The led by Chief Justice Awasthi dismissed the petition stating that the practice of hijab is not an essential practice under islam and thus does not fall within the ambit of Article 25 of the Constitution of India.

The High court had also held that prescription of school uniform is only a reasonable restriction which is constitutionally permissible which the students cannot object to and stated that the government had the power to issue such notification and that no case was made out against the government notification.

UNI SM ING。兩隊今季發揮、近況都未如理想，此番正面對決誰勝誰負關鍵看細節。
    
    　　今季常規賽截至目前，天空錄得12勝22負，最近這波三連敗相當打擊士氣——分別不敵狂熱、女武神以及今仗對手暴風。暴風的情況非常糟糕，7勝29負為整個聯盟最差戰績。自7月10日至今，暴風僅勝一場，就是8月11日在主場97比88戰勝天空，期間還經歷過慘不忍睹的十一連敗。
    
    　　天空方面可以重點關注卡美娜卡度素，此女賽季至今均場可以貢獻14.5分和8.6個籃板，籃板總數已達284個，即將迎來300個大關。上仗面對女武神一役，卡美娜卡度素表現高效，得到20分和6個籃板，是全隊唯一一位得分達20分的球員。另外卡美娜卡度素已經連續5場比賽得分上雙。

B | 馬龍加是暴風為數不多的亮點，此女賽季至今均場得到17.1分和8.9個籃板，兩項數據均為全隊最高。在前仗主場97比88擊敗天空一役中，馬龍加得到26分和10個籃板的兩雙數據；然而上仗憾負火焰一役中，馬龍加成為了罪人，投籃15中3，手感冰涼只得9分，可見作為年輕球員，這位法國新星狀態還不夠穩定。兩隊陣容情況：暴風——費勞傑莊遜和泰娜美亞因各種原因缺陣。天空——麥迪韋絲碧特和迪堅斯等人因各種原因缺陣。

Current article:http://mi5ty.fanfutaopoulaxiong.pics/xy0mq/cowllgh.doc

Published on:07:14:48